ReOpen911.info : Site d'information sur les attentats du 11 septembre 2001

Ca c'est une bonne nouvelle, Bush à mit Mickael Moore en colère, il va nous faire un bon reportage la dessus,

mieu que le premier j'espere.

belle !!!!

Daccord avec Schumi ,

Un docu a la Loose Change n'est pas le genre a Moore. Cependant , faut cesser de voir en lui peureux qui ne dit pas le fond des choses dans ses films.

Ce n'est pas qu'il ne dit pas la vérité... Il met plutôt l'emphase sur une approche plus surnoise et très subtile. Il évite de se mettre les pieds dans les plats et il évite de mettre trop d'attention sur ses propos , ce qui gâcherait tout nouveau documentaire avant même sa sortie...

Je viens de voir Sicko , et laissez-moi vous dire que Moore et un excellent "documentariste". Et bien qu'il ne condamnera jamais Bush sur la place publique , on peut compter sur lui pour lui faire perdre bien des plumes ! Et parfois même face a un certain auditoire , en partie favorable a l'administration Bush.

Bref , on ne peut que se réjouir d'un nouveau Moore !

Fahrenheit 9/11 sera diffusé sur France2 mercredi soir prochain.

Ce ne sera pas une suite mais quelque chose de bien plus large. il va aborder les dégâts de la politique de Bush dans le monde depuis 2001 et l'impact que cela a engendré sur la vie des américains. Avec la récession qui pointe le nez, Moore se demande si les Usa sont  en train de devenir comme l'empire romain avant sa chute. Il va apparemment faire des nouvelles révélations sur Bush. Il dit que les usa ont été pourris de l'intérieur, par les grandes multinationales et du complexe militaro-industriel. Il va aborder l'origine des néo-conservateurs. Il dit aussi que l'ennemie des américains dont ils devraient avoir le plus peur est peut-être ceux qui ont dirigés le pays durant ces 8 dernières années. oh lalala il se lache Moore a Cannes.

Michael Moore fait des révélations à Cannes



CANNES, France - Oscar-winning documentary maker Michael Moore, who this week unveiled plans for a follow-up to his anti-Bush polemic "Fahrenheit 9/11," said on Friday the new film would cover topics so "toxic" he probably should not make it.

But Moore, whose work ranges from an expose of American gun culture in "Bowling for Columbine" to a scathing critique of U.S. health care in "SiCKO," relishes controversy, so his unnamed new movie will likewise be risky, he told reporters at the Cannes film festival.

"It's something I shouldn't make, something that is dangerous," he said.

But Moore divulged few details of the film, which he only recently began and is tentatively set for release roughly a year from now by independent studio Overture Films and Paramount Vantage International.

The movie, he said, would not be a "sequel" to "Fahrenheit 9/11" but it will focus on policies of the Bush administration, examining how they have affected the lives of Americans and the reputation of the United States around the world.

With the United States in the throes of an economic slowdown and military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, Moore wondered aloud if the country had become like the Roman Empire before its fall. "Are we at that point yet?" he asked.

At box offices, his new movie will face risks. Recent films dealing with the current wars, such as "Stop-Loss" and "In the Valley of Elah," were commercial flops.

But Moore said he believed those movies failed because most Americans no longer support the wars, whereas in 2004, when "Fahrenheit 9/11" was released, most Americans still backed U.S. military pursuits in Iraq and Afghanistan.

He believes "Fahrenheit 9/11," which ranks as the top-grossing political documentary of all time with more than $220 million at global box offices, was a hit because it told audiences things about the Bush administration that they were surprised to hear.

Similarly, he said his new movie will succeed by exposing information about President George W. Bush and his policies that will leave audiences stunned.

"What I'm going to say in this film is what probably 70 percent of them (audiences) don't want to hear," Moore said.

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/lates … p?id=11505

May 16th, 2008 4:39 pm
Moore: `Fahrenheit 9/11' follow-up is not a sequel

By David Germain / Associated Press

CANNES, France — With his follow-up to "Fahrenheit 9/11," Michael Moore wants to examine America as an empire, study its standing since the Sept. 11 attacks and present revelations to surprise audiences as much as the first film did.

But he doesn't want to make a sequel.

"To just say it's a sequel is so wrong," Moore told The Associated Press on Friday at the Cannes Film Festival, where he met with potential international distributors for the film, due out in 2009.

The documentary announced this week at Cannes will be a broader chronicle than "Fahrenheit 9/11," which took President Bush to task over the terrorist attacks and the Iraq war.

"It would be easier and safer to make a sequel, if that's all it was, but this isn't about Bush. We all know this. Regardless of who the president is come November, we have a big mess, a big, big mess to be cleaned up, and I don't know whether it can be cleaned up," Moore said. "The toxicity of the spill may be so great that there's nothing we can do about it. If that's the case, where are we now as America and as Americans?"

"Fahrenheit 9/11" won the top prize at Cannes in 2004 and went on to top $100 million at the domestic box office, the only documentary to hit that mark.

Moore plans to keep details of the film to himself, saying he regretted talking too early about his health-care documentary "Sicko." Health insurers were able to mobilize against him, which "made it impossible for me to get in anywhere" for interviews, he said.

The new film, which doesn't yet have a title, is being financed by Overture Films, which is handling the U.S. release, and Paramount Vantage, which is overseeing international distribution.

Chris McGurk, chief executive officer of Overture, said the new film will be something of a culmination of Moore's previous work, which includes the General Motors tale "Roger & Me" and the Academy Award-winning gun-control documentary "Bowling for Columbine."

"The country has sort of been rotting from within, and the culprits are big business, big corporations, kind of the conservative government," McGurk said. "`Bowling for Columbine,' `Sicko,' `Roger and Me' all could have been episodes inside the context of this film."

While Moore said the new film would go beyond Bush, he dropped strong hints that the president would remain in his sights.

"Our biggest enemy that we should have been afraid of during these last eight years was perhaps an internal one, and I don't mean ourselves," Moore said. "I mean people that were up to absolutely no good when it came to what was best for this country and best for the world.

"It's my sincere hope that next Jan. 20, it's not just a transition taking place at the White House, where the U-Haul pulls up to take his stuff to Crawford (Texas). I think there should be a perp-walk coming out of the West Wing. The crimes that these people have committed go far beyond — and I'm not saying it on any kind of an emotional level or what my feelings are about Bush or whatever. I think there are very specific things that need to be looked at in terms of what they've done."

Moore, 54, scolded Hollywood for shying away from the Iraq War early on. He said "Fahrenheit 9/11" was the only war film to become a hit because it came out at a time when it touched a nerve, prompting people to question U.S. military action.

A recent wave of Iraq-themed movies bombed because support for the war has dwindled and most Americans now oppose it, he said.

"Because they didn't have the courage to put these films out when they were needed, the public didn't get to see them, the war continued," Moore said.

"When they finally started putting them out really last year and into this year, 70 percent of the public was against the war. Seventy percent of the public already knew that the war was no good, and they didn't need to spend Friday night at a movie theater after they've been working hard all week to sit there and be told this war is really a bad idea."

The crimes that these people have committed go far beyond

les crimes qu'on commis ces gens vont très loin

I think there are very specific things that need to be looked at in terms of what they've done."

Je pense qu'ils ont fait des choses qui ont besoin d'être plus étudiées dans le détail.

Que veut-il dire ? l'inside job ?

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mikei … p?id=11503

Dernière modification par Dr Gonzooo (18-05-2008 01:18:25)

SHA GUA DAN a écrit:

@ Dr Gonzooo : une traduction ou un résumé de l'article ci-dessus serait-il trop te demander ?
Tu connais la règle du jeu, pourtant...

Je ne suis pas un super traducteur mais ça a l'air d'être assez énorme ce qu'il dit et apparemment il a l'air de savoir ce qui c'est passé mais attend les élections ou le nouveau président élu.

Merci pour ce bon aperçu Dr Gonzooo !

bluerider1 a écrit:

Rappel: Michael MOORE a dit en sortant d'une projo presse de SICKO à NYC, que ses copains pompiers avaient des choses à dire, et qu'il trouvait anormal qu'on ne puisse voir les vidéos du Pentagone.... d'ici à ce qu'il en retrouve une ou deux...

(...)
Quant aux journalistes français, ils ont du souci à se faire avec la critique bien obligé du prochain Michael Moore. J'en jubile déjà.

BLUE

La vidéo où Michael Moore s'interroge sur le Pentagone (et ses nombreuses caméras) et où il parle de ces témoignages de pompiers au sujet des explosions au WTC se trouve là :
http://forum.reopen911.info/t10023-vide … moore.html

Une demande de traduction est lancée pour cette courte vidéo : étant donné la notoriété de Moore en France, ce serait vraiment béta de notre part de ne pas profiter de cette occasion...

Dernière modification par Zorg (21-05-2008 20:13:48)

Je viens juste de re-revoir Fahrenheit 9/11.
Avec le recul, je le trouve super bien fait. Vraiment!
Espérons que la suite serat à la hauteur.